The rise of cryptocurrency and block chain technology has revolutionized various industries, including finance, supply chain management, and healthcare. However, this rapid expansion has also led to a surge in disputes involving crypto assets. These disputes often arise from various contexts, including algorithm malfunctions on trading platforms, misrepresentation of crypto assets, and inadequate performance by market makers. Traditional legal frameworks often fall short in addressing these disputes due to the decentralized and borderless nature of block chain transactions. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred method for resolving crypto disputes, offering flexibility, confidentiality, and expertise. This report explores the role of arbitration in cryptocurrency disputes, the challenges faced in enforcement, and the potential future developments in this area, with a specific focus on the Vietnamese regulatory landscape.
Crypto disputes encompass a wide range of issues stemming from the decentralized and pseudonymous nature of block chain transactions. Unlike traditional financial transactions, cryptocurrencies operate on a peer-to-peer basis, facilitated by block chain technology that ensures transparency and immutability. However, this decentralization poses challenges in terms of regulatory oversight, legal recognition, and enforcement of rights.
The volatility of crypto assets adds another layer of complexity. Disputes may arise from market fluctuations, breaches of smart contracts, misrepresentation of asset values, or technical malfunctions within trading platforms. These disputes often involve intricate technological details and require a nuanced understanding of block chain mechanisms and cryptographic principles.
Resolving crypto disputes in Vietnam faces several challenges.
In Vietnam, the legal status of cryptocurrencies is ambiguous. While cryptocurrencies are not explicitly banned, they are not recognized as legal tender or assets. The current Vietnamese legal framework does not acknowledge cryptocurrencies as a legitimate form of payment or currency, nor does it consider them as an asset or a foreign currency. According to Decree No. 52/2024/NĐ-CP, the issuing, providing, and using of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment are prohibited . Violations can result in administrative fines ranging from VND 50,000,000 to VND 100,000,000, or even criminal charges under Article 206.1(h) of the Penal Code. However, there are no legal provisions prohibiting using crypto as an intermediary for exchange, meaning using money to buy crypto and then selling crypto to obtain money. Therefore, there are many challenges in disputes involving cryptocurrencies in Vietnam. For instance, in Case No. 22/2017/HC-ST dated 21 September 2017, a tax authority in Vietnam issued a tax collection decision demanding income tax on profits generated from Bitcoin trading. The plaintiff argued that Bitcoin is not a taxable good or service under Vietnamese law and filed a lawsuit. The court ruled that Bitcoin is neither a legal means of payment nor a commodity or service, declaring the tax collection decision invalid. This case underscores the challenges and uncertainties faced by parties, including state authorities, in resolving disputes and conducting transactions involving cryptocurrencies.
The decentralized nature of block chain transactions complicates jurisdictional issues and regulatory compliance. Parties involved in disputes may span multiple jurisdictions, each with its own legal framework regarding cryptocurrencies, making it difficult to resolve disputes involving parties from multiple jurisdictions. In Vietnam, the lack of comprehensive regulation on cryptocurrencies creates significant legal uncertainty, complicating the resolution of disputes.
The pseudonymous nature of block chain transactions raises concerns about identifying parties involved in disputes. While transactions are recorded on the block chain, tracing them to specific individuals or entities requires specialized forensic analysis, posing challenges in enforcing legal remedies.
The rapid evolution of block chain technology outpaces traditional legal frameworks, which often struggle to adapt to the complexities of crypto disputes. Clear guidelines and precedents in crypto law are still evolving, leaving room for uncertainty and varied interpretations across jurisdictions.
Arbitration emerges as a preferred method for resolving crypto disputes due to its flexibility, expertise, and confidentiality. Unlike traditional courts, arbitration allows parties to choose arbitrators with specialized knowledge of both block chain technology and relevant legal principles. This expertise is crucial in addressing the technical nuances of smart contracts, cryptographic evidence, and the unique challenges posed by decentralized transactions.
Moreover, arbitration offers confidentiality, which is particularly valuable in preserving the privacy of parties involved in pseudonymous transactions. Arbitral awards are also generally easier to enforce across borders compared to court judgments, providing certainty and predictability in an otherwise rapidly evolving legal landscape.
However, enforcing arbitral awards in the crypto space presents significant jurisdictional challenges. Some jurisdictions may refuse to enforce arbitral awards involving cryptocurrencies if they conflict with local public policies or if cryptocurrencies are illegal in those regions. For instance, in countries where cryptocurrency transactions are banned or heavily restricted, courts may deem such awards unenforceable on the grounds that they contravene public policy or legal norms. This lack of uniformity in regulatory approaches creates a fragmented legal landscape, where the enforceability of an arbitral award is contingent upon the local legal framework and its stance on digital assets.
The unique legal landscape in Vietnam underscores the critical role of arbitration in resolving cryptocurrency disputes. The lack of clear regulatory frameworks and legal recognition for cryptocurrencies complicates traditional legal recourse, making arbitration a practical alternative. Arbitration offers the flexibility, confidentiality, and expertise necessary to navigate the complexities of block chain technology. As Vietnam's regulatory environment evolves, incorporating arbitration into the resolution of crypto disputes will foster trust, ensure fairness, and support the sustainable growth of the cryptocurrency sector.
Disclaimer: This Legal Update is intended to provide updates on the Laws for information purposes only, and should not be used or interpreted as our advice for business purposes. LNT & Partners shall not be liable for any use or application of the information for any business purpose. For further clarification or advice from the Legal Update, please consult our lawyers: Mr Le Net at net.le@lntpartners.com.
Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy: LNT & Partners has issued and maintained the policy in complying with all applicable laws and regulations on bribery and corruption in Vietnam and worldwide.
